[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <26dea518fc5e8da51e61db279d175364bfecd009.1684999824.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:38:33 +0800
From: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: xiaobo55x@...il.com, haibo1.xu@...el.com, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, seanjc@...gle.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: riscv: selftests: Make check_supported arch specific
check_supported() was used to verify whether a feature/extension was
supported in a guest in the get-reg-list test. Currently this info
can be retrieved through the KVM_CAP_ARM_* API in aarch64, but in
riscv, this info was only exposed through the KVM_GET_ONE_REG on
KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT pseudo registers.
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 32 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index f6ad7991a812..f1fc113e9719 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -99,6 +99,20 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
}
#ifdef __aarch64__
+static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
+{
+ struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
+
+ for_each_sublist(c, s) {
+ if (!s->capability)
+ continue;
+
+ __TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(s->capability),
+ "%s: %s not available, skipping tests\n",
+ config_name(c), s->name);
+ }
+}
+
static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
{
struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
@@ -126,6 +140,8 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm
struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ check_supported(c);
+
prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init);
vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
@@ -140,20 +156,6 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm
}
#endif
-static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
-{
- struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
-
- for_each_sublist(c, s) {
- if (!s->capability)
- continue;
-
- __TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(s->capability),
- "%s: %s not available, skipping tests\n",
- config_name(c), s->name);
- }
-}
-
static bool print_list;
static bool print_filtered;
@@ -165,8 +167,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
- check_supported(c);
-
vm = vm_create_barebones();
vcpu = vcpu_config_get_vcpu(c, vm);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists