[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <87f433096a95d21bcefe440629e74cd2a2d44470.1684999824.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:38:31 +0800
From: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: xiaobo55x@...il.com, haibo1.xu@...el.com, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, seanjc@...gle.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: arm64: selftests: Finish generalizing get-reg-list
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Add some unfortunate #ifdeffery to ensure the common get-reg-list.c
can be compiled and run with other architectures. The next
architecture to support get-reg-list should now only need to provide
$(ARCH_DIR)/get-reg-list.c where arch-specific print_reg() and
vcpu_configs[] get defined.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index 69bb91087081..f6ad7991a812 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id);
}
+#ifdef __aarch64__
static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
{
struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
@@ -120,6 +121,25 @@ static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
}
}
+static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+
+ prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init);
+ vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
+ aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
+ finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c);
+
+ return vcpu;
+}
+#else
+static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ return __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
+}
+#endif
+
static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
{
struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
@@ -139,7 +159,6 @@ static bool print_filtered;
static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
{
- struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n;
int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
@@ -149,10 +168,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
check_supported(c);
vm = vm_create_barebones();
- prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init);
- vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
- aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
- finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c);
+ vcpu = vcpu_config_get_vcpu(c, vm);
reg_list = vcpu_get_reg_list(vcpu);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists