[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <655707b8-f741-3ed0-b1ea-974b3ea496fb@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 10:14:33 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhongjinghua@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
chengzhihao1@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] block: Fix the partition start may overflow in
add_partition()
Hi,
在 2023/05/22 15:06, Zhong Jinghua 写道:
> From: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>
>
> In the block_ioctl, we can pass in the unsigned number 0x8000000000000000
> as an input parameter, like below:
>
> block_ioctl
> blkdev_ioctl
> blkpg_ioctl
> blkpg_do_ioctl
> copy_from_user
> bdev_add_partition
> add_partition
> p->start_sect = start; // start = 0x8000000000000000
start_sect is 0x8..... >> SECTOR_SHIFT.
>
> Then, there was an warning when submit bio:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 382 at fs/iomap/apply.c:54
> Call trace:
> iomap_apply+0x644/0x6e0
> __iomap_dio_rw+0x5cc/0xa24
> iomap_dio_rw+0x4c/0xcc
> ext4_dio_read_iter
> ext4_file_read_iter
> ext4_file_read_iter+0x318/0x39c
> call_read_iter
> lo_rw_aio.isra.0+0x748/0x75c
> do_req_filebacked+0x2d4/0x370
> loop_handle_cmd
> loop_queue_work+0x94/0x23c
> kthread_worker_fn+0x160/0x6bc
> loop_kthread_worker_fn+0x3c/0x50
> kthread+0x20c/0x25c
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>
> Stack:
>
> submit_bio_noacct
> submit_bio_checks
> blk_partition_remap
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector += p->start_sect
> // bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = 0xffc0000000000000 + 65408
> ..
> loop_queue_work
> loop_handle_cmd
> do_req_filebacked
> pos = ((loff_t) blk_rq_pos(rq) << 9) + lo->lo_offset // pos < 0
> lo_rw_aio
> call_read_iter
> ext4_dio_read_iter
> __iomap_dio_rw
> iomap_apply
> ext4_iomap_begin
> map.m_lblk = offset >> blkbits
> ext4_set_iomap
> iomap->offset = (u64) map->m_lblk << blkbits
> // iomap->offset = 64512
> WARN_ON(iomap.offset > pos) // iomap.offset = 64512 and pos < 0
>
> This is unreasonable for start + length > disk->part0.nr_sects. There is
> already a similar check in blk_add_partition().
> Fix it by adding a check in bdev_add_partition().
The checking that you add is blkpg_do_ioctl().
>
> Reported-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>
> ---
> block/ioctl.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index 9c5f637ff153..3223ea862523 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -33,9 +33,16 @@ static int blkpg_do_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev,
> if (op == BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION)
> return bdev_del_partition(disk, p.pno);
>
> + if (p.start < 0 || p.length <= 0 || p.start + p.length < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> start = p.start >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> length = p.length >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
>
> + /* length may be equal to 0 after right shift */
> + if (!length || start + length > get_capacity(bdev->bd_disk))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> switch (op) {
> case BLKPG_ADD_PARTITION:
> /* check if partition is aligned to blocksize */
>
The change itself looks good to me, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists