[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230525-bling-entree-1446ae1c56bc@spud>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 16:15:03 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com, l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add property to change
GPIO function
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:34:43AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 14:11:22 +0300
> andy.shevchenko@...il.com wrote:
> > I'm wondering if we can convert this to YAML first and then add a new property.
> I think it would be best to do it after this patch series.
> Keep in mind that the original intent of this patch series,
> and this new property, was to fix a regression related to the
> GPIOs, and I think that converting to YAML would simply delay
> and add much noise to the discussion at this point.
I think that that is reasonable.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists