linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/4] md/raid10: improve code of mrdev in raid10_sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230526074551.669792-3-linan666@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 15:45:49 +0800
From:   linan666@...weicloud.com
To:     song@...nel.org, bingjingc@...ology.com, allenpeng@...ology.com,
        alexwu@...ology.com, shli@...com, neilb@...e.de
Cc:     linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linan122@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
        houtao1@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] md/raid10: improve code of mrdev in raid10_sync_request

From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>

'need_recover' and 'mrdev' are equivalent in raid10_sync_request(), and
inc mrdev->nr_pending is unreasonable if don't need recovery. Replace
'need_recover' with 'mrdev', and only inc nr_pending when needed.

Suggested-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index e21502c03b45..9de9eabff209 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -3437,7 +3437,6 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
 			sector_t sect;
 			int must_sync;
 			int any_working;
-			int need_recover = 0;
 			struct raid10_info *mirror = &conf->mirrors[i];
 			struct md_rdev *mrdev, *mreplace;
 
@@ -3446,14 +3445,14 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
 			mreplace = rcu_dereference(mirror->replacement);
 
 			if (mrdev != NULL &&
-			    !test_bit(Faulty, &mrdev->flags) &&
-			    !test_bit(In_sync, &mrdev->flags))
-				need_recover = 1;
+			    (test_bit(Faulty, &mrdev->flags) ||
+			    test_bit(In_sync, &mrdev->flags)))
+				mrdev = NULL;
 			if (mreplace != NULL &&
 			    test_bit(Faulty, &mreplace->flags))
 				mreplace = NULL;
 
-			if (!need_recover && !mreplace) {
+			if (!mrdev && !mreplace) {
 				rcu_read_unlock();
 				continue;
 			}
@@ -3487,7 +3486,8 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
 				rcu_read_unlock();
 				continue;
 			}
-			atomic_inc(&mrdev->nr_pending);
+			if (mrdev)
+				atomic_inc(&mrdev->nr_pending);
 			if (mreplace)
 				atomic_inc(&mreplace->nr_pending);
 			rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -3574,7 +3574,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
 				r10_bio->devs[1].devnum = i;
 				r10_bio->devs[1].addr = to_addr;
 
-				if (need_recover) {
+				if (mrdev) {
 					bio = r10_bio->devs[1].bio;
 					bio->bi_next = biolist;
 					biolist = bio;
@@ -3619,7 +3619,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
 					for (k = 0; k < conf->copies; k++)
 						if (r10_bio->devs[k].devnum == i)
 							break;
-					if (!test_bit(In_sync,
+					if (mrdev && !test_bit(In_sync,
 						      &mrdev->flags)
 					    && !rdev_set_badblocks(
 						    mrdev,
@@ -3645,12 +3645,14 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
 				if (rb2)
 					atomic_dec(&rb2->remaining);
 				r10_bio = rb2;
-				rdev_dec_pending(mrdev, mddev);
+				if (mrdev)
+					rdev_dec_pending(mrdev, mddev);
 				if (mreplace)
 					rdev_dec_pending(mreplace, mddev);
 				break;
 			}
-			rdev_dec_pending(mrdev, mddev);
+			if (mrdev)
+				rdev_dec_pending(mrdev, mddev);
 			if (mreplace)
 				rdev_dec_pending(mreplace, mddev);
 			if (r10_bio->devs[0].bio->bi_opf & MD_FAILFAST) {
-- 
2.31.1