[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHBrS4hTZZn3w4tF@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 01:18:19 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: hughd@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, p.raghav@...sung.com,
da.gomez@...sung.com, rohan.puri@...sung.com,
rpuri.linux@...il.com, a.manzanares@...sung.com, dave@...olabs.net,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org, hare@...e.de,
kbusch@...nel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/8] add support for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 01:14:55AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:55:44AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > This is an initial attempt to add support for block size > PAGE_SIZE for tmpfs.
>
> The concept of a block size doesn't make any sense for tmpfs. What
> are you actually trying to do here?
More of helping to test high order folios for tmpfs. Swap for instance
would be one thing we could use to test.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists