[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHBtk3mmupubbWyc@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 01:28:03 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, hughd@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, brauner@...nel.org,
djwong@...nel.org, p.raghav@...sung.com, da.gomez@...sung.com,
rohan.puri@...sung.com, rpuri.linux@...il.com,
a.manzanares@...sung.com, dave@...olabs.net, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
keescook@...omium.org, hare@...e.de, kbusch@...nel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/8] add support for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 01:18:19AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 01:14:55AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:55:44AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > This is an initial attempt to add support for block size > PAGE_SIZE for tmpfs.
> >
> > The concept of a block size doesn't make any sense for tmpfs. What
> > are you actually trying to do here?
>
> More of helping to test high order folios for tmpfs. Swap for instance
> would be one thing we could use to test.
I'm still not sure where the concept of a block size would come in here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists