[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520322.1685089759@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 09:29:19 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE in pin_user_pages()
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> Shouldn't unpin_user_pages
It calls gup_put_folio() which is where the skip is.
> and bio_release_page also be updated to skip a zero page here?
Porbably best to leave it to unpin_user_page() there. I've tried to hide the
behaviour entirely within gup.c.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists