linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee03b7ce-8257-17f9-f83e-bea2c64aff16@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 08:35:23 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs

On 5/25/23 3:48 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Jens, here's the full series of block layer patches needed for bcachefs:
> 
> Some of these (added exports, zero_fill_bio_iter?) can probably go with
> the bcachefs pull and I'm just including here for completeness. The main
> ones are the bio_iter patches, and the __invalidate_super() patch.
> 
> The bio_iter series has a new documentation patch.
> 
> I would still like the __invalidate_super() patch to get some review
> (from VFS people? unclear who owns this).

I wanted to check the code generation for patches 4 and 5, but the
series doesn't seem to apply to current -git nor my for-6.5/block.
There's no base commit in this cover letter either, so what is this
against?

Please send one that applies to for-6.5/block so it's a bit easier
to take a closer look at this.

-- 
Jens Axboe