[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023052647-tacking-wince-85c5@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 17:43:55 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...valent.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, yhs@...com, eddyz87@...il.com, sdf@...gle.com,
error27@...il.com, iii@...ux.ibm.com, memxor@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 08/30] selftests/bpf: check that modifier
resolves after pointer
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 06:04:43PM +0100, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:04 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Great, any specific commits that fix this issue would be appreciated to
> > be pointed at so we can apply them.
>
> The problem was introduced by commit f4b8c0710ab6 ("selftests/bpf: Add
> verifier test for release_reference()") in your tree. Seems like
> fixup_map_ringbuf was introduced in upstream commit 4237e9f4a962
> ("selftests/bpf: Add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill") but that
> wasn't backported.
So what tree(s) does this need to be backported to? I'm confused, this
is a 6.2 email thread which is long end-of-life.
> To restate my original question: how can we avoid breaking BPF
> selftests? From personal experience this happens somewhat regularly.
It can be avoided by people testing and letting me know when things
break :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists