lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJkOOcombRniD7PP4KY=5Z6tx5QMQ-M24KS_AZ0h4nAcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 18:46:04 +0200
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Vlad Efanov <vefanov@...ras.ru>
Cc:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp6: Fix race condition in udp6_sendmsg & connect

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 6:09 PM Vlad Efanov <vefanov@...ras.ru> wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
>
> udp6_sendmsg() currently still locks the socket (on line 1595).
>

Not really, look more closely at lines 1580 -> 1594


>
> Best regards,
>
> Vlad.
>
>
> On 26.05.2023 18:29, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 5:08 PM Vladislav Efanov <VEfanov@...ras.ru> wrote:
> >> Syzkaller got the following report:
> >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sk_setup_caps+0x621/0x690 net/core/sock.c:2018
> >> Read of size 8 at addr ffff888027f82780 by task syz-executor276/3255
> > Please include a full report.
> >
> >> The function sk_setup_caps (called by ip6_sk_dst_store_flow->
> >> ip6_dst_store) referenced already freed memory as this memory was
> >> freed by parallel task in udpv6_sendmsg->ip6_sk_dst_lookup_flow->
> >> sk_dst_check.
> >>
> >>            task1 (connect)              task2 (udp6_sendmsg)
> >>          sk_setup_caps->sk_dst_set |
> >>                                    |  sk_dst_check->
> >>                                    |      sk_dst_set
> >>                                    |      dst_release
> >>          sk_setup_caps references  |
> >>          to already freed dst_entry|
> >
> >> The reason for this race condition is: udp6_sendmsg() calls
> >> ip6_sk_dst_lookup() without lock for sock structure and tries to
> >> allocate/add dst_entry structure to sock structure in parallel with
> >> "connect" task.
> >>
> >> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > This is a bogus Fixes: tag
> >
> > In old times, UDP sendmsg() was using the socket lock.
> >
> > Then, in linux-4.0 Vlad Yasevich made UDP v6 sendmsg() lockless (and
> > racy in many points)
> >
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Efanov <VEfanov@...ras.ru>
> >> ---
> >>   net/ipv6/udp.c | 3 +++
> >>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> >> index e5a337e6b970..a5ecd5d93b0a 100644
> >> --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
> >> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> >> @@ -1563,12 +1563,15 @@ int udpv6_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> >>
> >>          fl6->flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(ipc6.tclass, fl6->flowlabel);
> >>
> >> +       lock_sock(sk);
> >>          dst = ip6_sk_dst_lookup_flow(sk, fl6, final_p, connected);
> >>          if (IS_ERR(dst)) {
> >>                  err = PTR_ERR(dst);
> >>                  dst = NULL;
> >> +               release_sock(sk);
> >>                  goto out;
> >>          }
> >> +       release_sock(sk);
> >>
> >>          if (ipc6.hlimit < 0)
> >>                  ipc6.hlimit = ip6_sk_dst_hoplimit(np, fl6, dst);
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> > There must be another way really.
> > You just killed UDP performance.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ