[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230526184139.5.Ia593afc9eb12082d55ea6681dc2c5a89677f20a8@changeid>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:41:35 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] watchdog/hardlockup: remove softlockup comment in touch_nmi_watchdog()
In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: add comments to
touch_nmi_watchdog()") we adjusted some comments for
touch_nmi_watchdog(). The comment about the softlockup had a typo and
were also felt to be too obvious. Remove it.
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
include/linux/nmi.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 3a27169ec383..6c6a5ce77c66 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -140,10 +140,6 @@ static inline void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
*/
arch_touch_nmi_watchdog();
- /*
- * Touching the hardlock detector implcitily pets the
- * softlockup detector too
- */
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
}
--
2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists