[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230526184139.4.Iccee2d1ea19114dafb6553a854ea4d8ab2a3f25b@changeid>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:41:34 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] watchdog/hardlockup: In watchdog_hardlockup_check() use cpumask_copy()
In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: add a "cpu" param to
watchdog_hardlockup_check()") we started using a cpumask to keep track
of which CPUs to backtrace. When setting up this cpumask, it's better
to use cpumask_copy() than to just copy the structure directly. Fix this.
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 32dac8028753..85f4839b6faf 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -154,7 +154,9 @@ void watchdog_hardlockup_check(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs)
*/
if (is_hardlockup(cpu)) {
unsigned int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct cpumask backtrace_mask = *cpu_online_mask;
+ struct cpumask backtrace_mask;
+
+ cpumask_copy(&backtrace_mask, cpu_online_mask);
/* Only print hardlockups once. */
if (per_cpu(watchdog_hardlockup_warned, cpu))
--
2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists