linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] pinctrl: ingenic: relax return value check for IRQ get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230528181325.405d9dad@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sun, 28 May 2023 18:13:25 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] pinctrl: ingenic: relax return value check for
 IRQ get

On Fri, 26 May 2023 09:38:39 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:

> fwnode_irq_get[_byname]() were changed to not return 0 anymore.
> 
> Drop check for return value 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> 
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

> ---
> Revision history:
>  - No changes
> 
> Please note, I took Linus' reply to v4 cover-letter as ack && added the
> tag. Please let me know if this was not Ok.
> 
> The first patch of the series changes the fwnode_irq_get() so this depends
> on the first patch of the series and should not be applied alone.
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> index 2f220a47b749..86e71ad703a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> @@ -4201,8 +4201,6 @@ static int __init ingenic_gpio_probe(struct ingenic_pinctrl *jzpc,
>  	err = fwnode_irq_get(fwnode, 0);
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return err;
> -	if (!err)
> -		return -EINVAL;
>  	jzgc->irq = err;
>  
>  	girq = &jzgc->gc.irq;