[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1617a5d426462a9acb9c83e8b65b83093df90bc6.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 08:32:08 +0000
From: Yong Wu (吴勇) <Yong.Wu@...iatek.com>
To: "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"wenst@...omium.org" <wenst@...omium.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iommu/mediatek: Flush IOTLB completely only if domain
has been attached
On Fri, 2023-05-26 at 16:53 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> If an IOMMU domain was never attached, it lacks any linkage to the
> actual IOMMU hardware. Attempting to do flush_iotlb_all() on it will
> result in a NULL pointer dereference. This seems to happen after the
> recent IOMMU core rework in v6.4-rc1.
>
> Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual
> address 0000000000000018
> Call trace:
> mtk_iommu_flush_iotlb_all+0x20/0x80
> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings.part.0+0x13c/0x230
> iommu_setup_default_domain+0x29c/0x4d0
> iommu_probe_device+0x12c/0x190
> of_iommu_configure+0x140/0x208
> of_dma_configure_id+0x19c/0x3c0
> platform_dma_configure+0x38/0x88
> really_probe+0x78/0x2c0
>
> Check if the "bank" field has been filled in before actually
> attempting
> the IOTLB flush to avoid it. The IOTLB is also flushed when the
> device
> comes out of runtime suspend, so it should have a clean initial
> state.
>
> Fixes: 08500c43d4f7 ("iommu/mediatek: Adjust the structure")
The interface "iommu_setup_default_domain" doesn't exist in v6.4-rc1.
This is a fixes for linux-next. And the Fixes tag should be:
152431e4fe7f ("iommu: Do iommu_group_create_direct_mappings() before
attach")
then:
Reviewed-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Thanks very much.
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> I think this is a valid fix, but I'm not very familiar with the
> hardware
> or the design of the driver. The ARM SMMU drivers seem to do this as
> well.
>
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index aecc7d154f28..e93906d6e112 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -781,7 +781,8 @@ static void mtk_iommu_flush_iotlb_all(struct
> iommu_domain *domain)
> {
> struct mtk_iommu_domain *dom = to_mtk_domain(domain);
>
> - mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(dom->bank->parent_data);
> + if (dom->bank)
> + mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(dom->bank->parent_data);
> }
>
> static void mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> --
> 2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists