[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58e7e5ff-5e40-7871-efe2-bfe88bd19dad@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 15:19:11 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8226: Add mdss nodes
On 29/05/2023 15:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 29.05.2023 11:44, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> Add the nodes that describe the mdss so that display can work on
>> MSM8226.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi
>> index 42acb9ddb8cc..182d6405032f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi
>> @@ -636,6 +636,124 @@ smd-edge {
>> label = "lpass";
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + mdss: display-subsystem@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,mdss";
>> + reg = <0xfd900000 0x100>, <0xfd924000 0x1000>;
>> + reg-names = "mdss_phys", "vbif_phys";
>> +
>> + power-domains = <&mmcc MDSS_GDSC>;
>> +
>> + clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&mmcc MDSS_AXI_CLK>,
>> + <&mmcc MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "iface", "bus", "vsync";
> One per line, please
>
>> +
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> We're not using the irq cell, is that necessary/should that be 0?
No. With 0 it would mean that there is a single interrupt for mdss
source, which clearly is not the case.
>
>> +
>> + status = "disabled";
> status should go last
>
>> +
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + ranges;
>> +
>> + mdp: display-controller@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,msm8226-mdp5", "qcom,mdp5";
>> + reg = <0xfd900100 0x22000>;
>> + reg-names = "mdp_phys";
>> +
>> + interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
>> + interrupts = <0>;
>> +
>> + clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&mmcc MDSS_AXI_CLK>,
>> + <&mmcc MDSS_MDP_CLK>,
>> + <&mmcc MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "iface", "bus", "core", "vsync";
> One per line, please
>
>> +
>> + ports {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> Would port { work here? I remember one mdss component's bindings
> didn't allow it but don't recall which one
Let's use ports /port@0 for uniformity even if there is just a single
port always.
>
>> +
>> + port@0 {
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + mdp5_intf1_out: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_in>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists