[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023052905-maimed-studied-3563@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 15:27:16 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Ray Chi <raychi@...gle.com>, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: phy: add usb phy notify port status API
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:26:02AM +0800, Stanley Chang wrote:
> In Realtek SoC, the parameter of usb phy is designed to can dynamic
> tuning base on port status. Therefore, add a notify callback of phy
> driver when usb port status change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
> ---
> v1 to v2 change:
> No change
> ---
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> include/linux/usb/phy.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index 97a0f8faea6e..b4fbbeae1927 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -614,6 +614,19 @@ static int hub_ext_port_status(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, int type,
> ret = 0;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&hub->status_mutex);
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + struct usb_device *hdev = hub->hdev;
> +
> + if (hdev && !hdev->parent) {
> + struct usb_hcd *hcd = bus_to_hcd(hdev->bus);
> +
> + if (hcd->usb_phy)
> + usb_phy_notify_port_status(hcd->usb_phy,
> + port1 - 1, *status, *change);
> + }
> + }
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/phy.h b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> index e4de6bc1f69b..53bf3540098f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ struct usb_phy {
> */
> int (*set_wakeup)(struct usb_phy *x, bool enabled);
>
> + /* notify phy port status change */
> + int (*notify_port_status)(struct usb_phy *x,
> + int port, u16 portstatus, u16 portchange);
> +
> /* notify phy connect status change */
> int (*notify_connect)(struct usb_phy *x,
> enum usb_device_speed speed);
Why can't this be part of the same notify_connect() callback?
What makes it different somehow? Please document this much better.
> @@ -316,6 +320,16 @@ usb_phy_set_wakeup(struct usb_phy *x, bool enabled)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int
> +usb_phy_notify_port_status(struct usb_phy *x, int port, u16 portstatus,
> + u16 portchange)
> +{
> + if (x && x->notify_port_status)
How can x ever be NULL?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists