[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230529-impurity-dismount-bca5c9100c9b@spud>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 19:59:22 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Ray Chi <raychi@...gle.com>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: phy: realtek: Add the doc about the
Realtek SoC USB 2.0/3.0 PHY
Hey,
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:26:04AM +0800, Stanley Chang wrote:
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - realtek,usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1295-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1395-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1619-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1319-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1619b-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1312c-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1319d-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1315e-usb2phy
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - realtek,usb3phy
> + - realtek,rtd-usb3phy
> + - realtek,rtd1295-usb3phy
> + - realtek,rtd1619-usb3phy
> + - realtek,rtd1319-usb3phy
> + - realtek,rtd1619b-usb3phy
> + - realtek,rtd1319d-usb3phy
Ignoring everything else, because I really want Krzysztof or Rob to
review this rather than me, but what's going on here with the
compatibles?
What hardware do "usbNphy" and "rtd-usbNphy" represent?
You have device-specific compatibles, which is great, but you also allow
only those two generic ones. I had a _brief_ look at the driver, and it
seems like there is no decision making done based on the compatibles,
only on the properties. Is that correct?
If it is, I would understand having "realtek,usb3phy" as a fallback
compatible for "realtek,rtd1619-usb3phy", but I do not get the current
setup.
Also, I really think this should be broken down into two patches, one
for each of USB 2 & 3.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists