[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e406b76-77c2-4ffd-ba51-943f36416a6b@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 07:19:47 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: Enable LOCKDEP support
Helge,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 09:06:40AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v6.0+
> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
> ---
> arch/parisc/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/Kconfig b/arch/parisc/Kconfig
> index 466a25525364..967bde65dd0e 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/parisc/Kconfig
> @@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ config PM
> config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> def_bool y
>
> +config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
> + bool
> + default y
> +
> config ISA_DMA_API
> bool
>
This patch results in a bunch of WARNING message with each parisc boot if
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are enabled.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5545 check_flags+0x24c/0x274
Backtrace:
[<1026d44c>] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x388
[<10e8c66c>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x64/0x98
[<10e922dc>] down_trylock+0x20/0x58
[<102768c8>] __down_trylock_console_sem+0x44/0x114
[<1027b768>] vprintk_emit+0xa8/0x3dc
[<1027bac4>] vprintk_default+0x28/0x38
[<1027c574>] vprintk+0xa4/0xb4
[<10e6c62c>] _printk+0x30/0x40
[<10e37700>] report_bug+0x338/0x35c
[<101c19fc>] handle_interruption+0x654/0x768
[<101bb070>] intr_check_sig+0x0/0x38
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/context_tracking.c:367 ct_irq_enter+0x94/0xb0
Backtrace:
[<101f0c1c>] irq_enter+0x18/0x30
[<101c2dec>] do_cpu_irq_mask+0x7c/0x388
[<101bb064>] intr_return+0x0/0xc
Is that going to be fixed, or should I disable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
for parisc in my testing ?
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists