[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230530033239.17534-1-gouhao@uniontech.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:32:39 +0800
From: gouhao@...ontech.com
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs/buffer: using __bio_add_page in submit_bh_wbc()
From: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
In submit_bh_wbc(), bio is newly allocated, so it
does not need any merging logic.
And using bio_add_page here will execute 'bio_flagged(
bio, BIO_CLONED)' and 'bio_full' twice, which is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
---
fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index a7fc561758b1..5abc26d8399d 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ static void submit_bh_wbc(blk_opf_t opf, struct buffer_head *bh,
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
- bio_add_page(bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
+ __bio_add_page(bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
BUG_ON(bio->bi_iter.bi_size != bh->b_size);
bio->bi_end_io = end_bio_bh_io_sync;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists