[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230601-exception-dodgy-97f2101d8a0e@spud>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 21:16:04 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Qii Wang <qii.wang@...iatek.com>,
Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>,
郭小桥 <joe@...nstrong.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mt65xx: add additional clocks
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Adding the clocks is done in patch 2/2 which just wasn't sent to
> devicetree@ and dt maintainers, but to the relevant mailing lists
> instead. Was that wrong and should I always send the complete series
> also to devicetree@ as well as dt maintainers?
Everyone is different, but getting both patches of a 2 patch series
really should not annoy anyone and avoiding reviewers having to go
hunting on lore etc is always a positive :)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists