[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a68b22c5-c1c2-2cc2-0d9d-69cee92fc779@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:10:59 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] x86/mtrr: fix handling with PAT but without MTRR
On 31.05.23 19:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 04:20:08PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> One other note: why does mtrr_cleanup() think that using 8 instead of 6
>> variable MTRRs would be an "optimal setting"?
>
> Maybe the more extensive debug output below would help answer that...
>
>> IMO it should replace the original setup only in case it is using _less_
>> MTRRs than before.
>
> Right.
The attached patch will do that.
Juergen
View attachment "v7-0001-x86-mtrr-Let-mtrr_cleanup-not-increase-number-of-.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2367 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists