[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168571901091.65587.1980168076721765173.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 16:16:50 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Boerge Struempfel <boerge.struempfel@...il.com>,
"Mahapatra, Amit Kumar" <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: fix mixing of native and gpio
chipselects for imx51/imx53/imx6 variants
On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:57:30 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Commit 87c614175bbf (spi: spi-imx: fix MX51_ECSPI_* macros when cs >
> 3) ensured that the argument passed to the macros was masked with &3,
> so that we no longer write outside the intended fields in the various
> control registers. When all chip selects are gpios, this works just
> fine.
>
> However, when a mix of native and gpio chip selects are in use, that
> masking is too naive. Say, for example, that SS0 is muxed as native
> chip select, and there is also a chip at 4 (obviously with a gpio
> cs). In that case, when accessing the latter chip, both the SS0 pin
> and the gpio pin will be asserted low.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: spi-imx: fix mixing of native and gpio chipselects for imx51/imx53/imx6 variants
commit: a34e0353a681bbdd0402825e25410c3236109f31
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists