[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230602004657.GA8942@KORCO045595.samsungds.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 09:46:57 +0900
From: Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@...sung.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jwook1.kim@...sung.com,
lakkyung.jung@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Optionally re-enable reader optimistic
spinning
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 10:06:13AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 5/31/23 21:22, Bongkyu Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:29:54PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > On 5/30/23 20:34, Bongkyu Kim wrote:
> > > > Remove reader optimistic spinning has a great regression on application
> > > I won't consider this a great regression if it is just a few % point of
> > > performance differences.
> > >
> > > BTW, this patch is mostly a revert of commit 617f3ef95177 ("locking/rwsem:
> > > Remove reader optimistic spinning"). So it should be mentioned here.
> > >
> > I will fix these and resend patch v2.
> > Thanks for your review.
>
> There is one more point that I forgot to mention. Enabling this option can
> degrade or improve performance depending on the actual workload. A system
> administrator that is not familiar with the rwsem code will not know what to
> do with it. So I would suggest a bit more wording on the documentation part
> about under what condition should the users try to enable it to see if it
> helps.
>
> -Longman
>
All right. I will add a more wording to the documentation part and resend
patch v3.
Thanks,
Bongkyu
> > > > startup performance in android device. In mobile environment, reader
> > > > optimistic spinning is still useful because there're not many readers.
> > > > So re-enable reader optimistic spinning and disabled by default. And,
> > > > can turn on by cmdline.
> > > >
> > > > Test result:
> > > > This is 15 application startup performance in our s5e8535 soc.
> > > > - Cortex A78*2 + Cortex A55*6
> > > >
> > > > Application base opt_rspin Diff Diff(%)
> > > > -------------------- ------ --------- ---- -------
> > > > * Total(geomean) 343 330 -13 +3.8%
> > > > -------------------- ------ --------- ---- -------
> > > > helloworld 110 108 -2 +1.8%
> > > > Amazon_Seller 397 388 -9 +2.3%
> > > > Whatsapp 311 304 -7 +2.3%
> > > > Simple_PDF_Reader 500 463 -37 +7.4%
> > > > FaceApp 330 317 -13 +3.9%
> > > > Timestamp_Camera_Free 451 443 -8 +1.8%
> > > > Kindle 629 597 -32 +5.1%
> > > > Coinbase 243 233 -10 +4.1%
> > > > Firefox 425 399 -26 +6.1%
> > > > Candy_Crush_Soda 552 538 -14 +2.5%
> > > > Hill_Climb_Racing 245 230 -15 +6.1%
> > > > Call_Recorder 437 426 -11 +2.5%
> > > > Color_Fill_3D 190 180 -10 +5.3%
> > > > eToro 512 505 -7 +1.4%
> > > > GroupMe 281 266 -15 +5.3%
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@...sung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +
> > > > kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h | 5 +-
> > > > kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 292 +++++++++++++++---
> > > > 3 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > index bb23a36a7ff7..b92a6b3f965f 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > @@ -5495,6 +5495,8 @@
> > > > rw [KNL] Mount root device read-write on boot
> > > > + rwsem.opt_rspin= [KNL] Use rwsem reader optimistic spinning
> > > > +
> > > > S [KNL] Run init in single mode
> > > > s390_iommu= [HW,S390]
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> > > > index 97fb6f3f840a..270a0d351932 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> > > > +++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> > > > @@ -56,9 +56,12 @@ LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_sleep_reader) /* # of reader sleeps */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_sleep_writer) /* # of writer sleeps */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_wake_reader) /* # of reader wakeups */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_wake_writer) /* # of writer wakeups */
> > > > -LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_lock) /* # of opt-acquired write locks */
> > > > +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_rlock) /* # of opt-acquired read locks */
> > > > +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_wlock) /* # of opt-acquired write locks */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_fail) /* # of failed optspins */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_nospin) /* # of disabled optspins */
> > > > +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_norspin) /* # of disabled reader-only optspins */
> > > > +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_rlock2) /* # of opt-acquired 2ndary read locks */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock) /* # of read locks acquired */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock_steal) /* # of read locks by lock stealing */
> > > > LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock_fast) /* # of fast read locks acquired */
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> > > > index 9eabd585ce7a..016dbc4312e6 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> > > > @@ -33,13 +33,19 @@
> > > > #include "lock_events.h"
> > > > /*
> > > > - * The least significant 2 bits of the owner value has the following
> > > > + * The least significant 3 bits of the owner value has the following
> > > > * meanings when set.
> > > > * - Bit 0: RWSEM_READER_OWNED - The rwsem is owned by readers
> > > > - * - Bit 1: RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE - Cannot spin on a reader-owned lock
> > > > + * - Bit 1: RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE - Readers cannot spin on this lock.
> > > > + * - Bit 2: RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE - Writers cannot spin on this lock.
> > > > *
> > > > - * When the rwsem is reader-owned and a spinning writer has timed out,
> > > > - * the nonspinnable bit will be set to disable optimistic spinning.
> > > > + * When the rwsem is either owned by an anonymous writer, or it is
> > > > + * reader-owned, but a spinning writer has timed out, both nonspinnable
> > > > + * bits will be set to disable optimistic spinning by readers and writers.
> > > > + * In the later case, the last unlocking reader should then check the
> > > > + * writer nonspinnable bit and clear it only to give writers preference
> > > > + * to acquire the lock via optimistic spinning, but not readers. Similar
> > > > + * action is also done in the reader slowpath.
> > > > * When a writer acquires a rwsem, it puts its task_struct pointer
> > > > * into the owner field. It is cleared after an unlock.
> > > > @@ -59,9 +65,47 @@
> > > > * is previously owned by a writer and the following conditions are met:
> > > > * - rwsem is not currently writer owned
> > > > * - the handoff isn't set.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Reader optimistic spinning is helpful when the reader critical section
> > > > + * is short and there aren't that many readers around. It makes readers
> > > > + * relatively more preferred than writers. When a writer times out spinning
> > > > + * on a reader-owned lock and set the nospinnable bits, there are two main
> > > > + * reasons for that.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * 1) The reader critical section is long, perhaps the task sleeps after
> > > > + * acquiring the read lock.
> > > > + * 2) There are just too many readers contending the lock causing it to
> > > > + * take a while to service all of them.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * In the former case, long reader critical section will impede the progress
> > > > + * of writers which is usually more important for system performance. In
> > > > + * the later case, reader optimistic spinning tends to make the reader
> > > > + * groups that contain readers that acquire the lock together smaller
> > > > + * leading to more of them. That may hurt performance in some cases. In
> > > > + * other words, the setting of nonspinnable bits indicates that reader
> > > > + * optimistic spinning may not be helpful for those workloads that cause
> > > > + * it.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Therefore, any writers that had observed the setting of the writer
> > > > + * nonspinnable bit for a given rwsem after they fail to acquire the lock
> > > > + * via optimistic spinning will set the reader nonspinnable bit once they
> > > > + * acquire the write lock. Similarly, readers that observe the setting
> > > > + * of reader nonspinnable bit at slowpath entry will set the reader
> > > > + * nonspinnable bits when they acquire the read lock via the wakeup path.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Once the reader nonspinnable bit is on, it will only be reset when
> > > > + * a writer is able to acquire the rwsem in the fast path or somehow a
> > > > + * reader or writer in the slowpath doesn't observe the nonspinable bit.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This is to discourage reader optmistic spinning on that particular
> > > > + * rwsem and make writers more preferred. This adaptive disabling of reader
> > > > + * optimistic spinning will alleviate the negative side effect of this
> > > > + * feature.
> > > > */
> > > > #define RWSEM_READER_OWNED (1UL << 0)
> > > > -#define RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE (1UL << 1)
> > > > +#define RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE (1UL << 1)
> > > > +#define RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE (1UL << 2)
> > > > +#define RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE (RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE | RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE)
> > > > #define RWSEM_OWNER_FLAGS_MASK (RWSEM_READER_OWNED | RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
> > > > @@ -127,6 +171,12 @@
> > > > #define RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS|\
> > > > RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF|RWSEM_FLAG_READFAIL)
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> > > > +/* Reader optimistic spinning, default disabled */
> > > > +static bool rwsem_opt_rspin;
> > > > +module_param_named(opt_rspin, rwsem_opt_rspin, bool, 0644);
> > > > +#endif
> > > The rwsem code isn't really a kernel module. It is a bit odd to use module
> > > parameter here.
> > >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * All writes to owner are protected by WRITE_ONCE() to make sure that
> > > > * store tearing can't happen as optimistic spinners may read and use
> > > > @@ -171,7 +221,7 @@ static inline void __rwsem_set_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > > > struct task_struct *owner)
> > > > {
> > > > unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner | RWSEM_READER_OWNED |
> > > > - (atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE);
> > > > + (atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE);
> > > > atomic_long_set(&sem->owner, val);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -341,6 +391,7 @@ struct rwsem_waiter {
> > > > enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
> > > > unsigned long timeout;
> > > > bool handoff_set;
> > > > + unsigned long last_rowner;
> > > > };
> > > > #define rwsem_first_waiter(sem) \
> > > > list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list)
> > > > @@ -480,6 +531,10 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > > > * the reader is copied over.
> > > > */
> > > > owner = waiter->task;
> > > > + if (waiter->last_rowner & RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE) {
> > > > + owner = (void *)((unsigned long)owner | RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE);
> > > > + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_norspin);
> > > > + }
> > > > __rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem, owner);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -684,6 +739,30 @@ enum owner_state {
> > > > };
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Try to acquire read lock before the reader is put on wait queue.
> > > > + * Lock acquisition isn't allowed if the rwsem is locked or a writer handoff
> > > > + * is ongoing.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_try_read_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +{
> > > > + long count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (count & (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +
> > > > + count = atomic_long_fetch_add_acquire(RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> > > > + if (!(count & (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))) {
> > > > + rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
> > > > + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_rlock);
> > > > + return true;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Back out the change */
> > > > + atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Try to acquire write lock before the writer has been put on wait queue.
> > > > */
> > > > @@ -695,14 +774,15 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count,
> > > > count | RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED)) {
> > > > rwsem_set_owner(sem);
> > > > - lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_lock);
> > > > + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_wlock);
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > return false;
> > > > }
> > > > -static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > > > + unsigned long nonspinnable)
> > > > {
> > > > struct task_struct *owner;
> > > > unsigned long flags;
> > > > @@ -721,7 +801,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > /*
> > > > * Don't check the read-owner as the entry may be stale.
> > > > */
> > > > - if ((flags & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE) ||
> > > > + if ((flags & nonspinnable) ||
> > > > (owner && !(flags & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) && !owner_on_cpu(owner)))
> > > > ret = false;
> > > > @@ -732,9 +812,9 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > #define OWNER_SPINNABLE (OWNER_NULL | OWNER_WRITER | OWNER_READER)
> > > > static inline enum owner_state
> > > > -rwsem_owner_state(struct task_struct *owner, unsigned long flags)
> > > > +rwsem_owner_state(struct task_struct *owner, unsigned long flags, unsigned long nonspinnable)
> > > > {
> > > > - if (flags & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)
> > > > + if (flags & nonspinnable)
> > > > return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE;
> > > > if (flags & RWSEM_READER_OWNED)
> > > > @@ -744,7 +824,7 @@ rwsem_owner_state(struct task_struct *owner, unsigned long flags)
> > > > }
> > > > static noinline enum owner_state
> > > > -rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, unsigned long nonspinnable)
> > > > {
> > > > struct task_struct *new, *owner;
> > > > unsigned long flags, new_flags;
> > > > @@ -753,7 +833,7 @@ rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
> > > > owner = rwsem_owner_flags(sem, &flags);
> > > > - state = rwsem_owner_state(owner, flags);
> > > > + state = rwsem_owner_state(owner, flags, nonspinnable);
> > > > if (state != OWNER_WRITER)
> > > > return state;
> > > > @@ -766,7 +846,7 @@ rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > */
> > > > new = rwsem_owner_flags(sem, &new_flags);
> > > > if ((new != owner) || (new_flags != flags)) {
> > > > - state = rwsem_owner_state(new, new_flags);
> > > > + state = rwsem_owner_state(new, new_flags, nonspinnable);
> > > > break;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -816,12 +896,14 @@ static inline u64 rwsem_rspin_threshold(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > return sched_clock() + delta;
> > > > }
> > > > -static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem, bool wlock)
> > > > {
> > > > bool taken = false;
> > > > int prev_owner_state = OWNER_NULL;
> > > > int loop = 0;
> > > > u64 rspin_threshold = 0;
> > > > + unsigned long nonspinnable = wlock ? RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE
> > > > + : RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE;
> > > > /* sem->wait_lock should not be held when doing optimistic spinning */
> > > > if (!osq_lock(&sem->osq))
> > > > @@ -836,14 +918,15 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > for (;;) {
> > > > enum owner_state owner_state;
> > > > - owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem);
> > > > + owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, nonspinnable);
> > > > if (!(owner_state & OWNER_SPINNABLE))
> > > > break;
> > > > /*
> > > > * Try to acquire the lock
> > > > */
> > > > - taken = rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(sem);
> > > > + taken = wlock ? rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(sem)
> > > > + : rwsem_try_read_lock_unqueued(sem);
> > > > if (taken)
> > > > break;
> > > > @@ -851,7 +934,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > /*
> > > > * Time-based reader-owned rwsem optimistic spinning
> > > > */
> > > > - if (owner_state == OWNER_READER) {
> > > > + if (wlock && (owner_state == OWNER_READER)) {
> > > > /*
> > > > * Re-initialize rspin_threshold every time when
> > > > * the owner state changes from non-reader to reader.
> > > > @@ -860,7 +943,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > * the beginning of the 2nd reader phase.
> > > > */
> > > > if (prev_owner_state != OWNER_READER) {
> > > > - if (rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE))
> > > > + if (rwsem_test_oflags(sem, nonspinnable))
> > > > break;
> > > > rspin_threshold = rwsem_rspin_threshold(sem);
> > > > loop = 0;
> > > > @@ -935,30 +1018,89 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > }
> > > > /*
> > > > - * Clear the owner's RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE bit if it is set. This should
> > > > + * Clear the owner's RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE bit if it is set. This should
> > > > * only be called when the reader count reaches 0.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This give writers better chance to acquire the rwsem first before
> > > > + * readers when the rwsem was being held by readers for a relatively long
> > > > + * period of time. Race can happen that an optimistic spinner may have
> > > > + * just stolen the rwsem and set the owner, but just clearing the
> > > > + * RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE bit will do no harm anyway.
> > > > */
> > > > -static inline void clear_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +static inline void clear_wr_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > {
> > > > - if (unlikely(rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)))
> > > > - atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE, &sem->owner);
> > > > + if (unlikely(rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE)))
> > > > + atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE, &sem->owner);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * This function is called when the reader fails to acquire the lock via
> > > > + * optimistic spinning. In this case we will still attempt to do a trylock
> > > > + * when comparing the rwsem state right now with the state when entering
> > > > + * the slowpath indicates that the reader is still in a valid reader phase.
> > > > + * This happens when the following conditions are true:
> > > > + *
> > > > + * 1) The lock is currently reader owned, and
> > > > + * 2) The lock is previously not reader-owned or the last read owner changes.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * In the former case, we have transitioned from a writer phase to a
> > > > + * reader-phase while spinning. In the latter case, it means the reader
> > > > + * phase hasn't ended when we entered the optimistic spinning loop. In
> > > > + * both cases, the reader is eligible to acquire the lock. This is the
> > > > + * secondary path where a read lock is acquired optimistically.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * The reader non-spinnable bit wasn't set at time of entry or it will
> > > > + * not be here at all.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > > > + unsigned long last_rowner)
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned long owner = atomic_long_read(&sem->owner);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!(owner & RWSEM_READER_OWNED))
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (((owner ^ last_rowner) & ~RWSEM_OWNER_FLAGS_MASK) &&
> > > > + rwsem_try_read_lock_unqueued(sem)) {
> > > > + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_rlock2);
> > > > + lockevent_add(rwsem_opt_fail, -1);
> > > > + return true;
> > > > + }
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_no_spinners(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return !osq_is_locked(&sem->osq);
> > > > }
> > > > #else
> > > > -static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > > > + unsigned long nonspinnable)
> > > > {
> > > > return false;
> > > > }
> > > > -static inline bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem, bool wlock)
> > > > {
> > > > return false;
> > > > }
> > > > -static inline void clear_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { }
> > > > +static inline void clear_wr_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { }
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > > > + unsigned long last_rowner)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline bool rwsem_no_spinners(sem)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +}
> > > > static inline enum owner_state
> > > > -rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > +rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, unsigned long nonspinnable)
> > > > {
> > > > return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -984,7 +1126,7 @@ static inline void rwsem_cond_wake_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count,
> > > > wake_type = RWSEM_WAKE_READERS;
> > > > } else {
> > > > wake_type = RWSEM_WAKE_ANY;
> > > > - clear_nonspinnable(sem);
> > > > + clear_wr_nonspinnable(sem);
> > > > }
> > > > rwsem_mark_wake(sem, wake_type, wake_q);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -995,32 +1137,66 @@ static inline void rwsem_cond_wake_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count,
> > > > static struct rw_semaphore __sched *
> > > > rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int state)
> > > > {
> > > > - long adjustment = -RWSEM_READER_BIAS;
> > > > + long owner, adjustment = -RWSEM_READER_BIAS;
> > > > long rcnt = (count >> RWSEM_READER_SHIFT);
> > > > struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
> > > > DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
> > > > /*
> > > > * To prevent a constant stream of readers from starving a sleeping
> > > > - * waiter, don't attempt optimistic lock stealing if the lock is
> > > > - * currently owned by readers.
> > > > + * waiter, don't attempt optimistic spinning if the lock is currently
> > > > + * owned by readers.
> > > > */
> > > > - if ((atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) &&
> > > > - (rcnt > 1) && !(count & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED))
> > > > + owner = atomic_long_read(&sem->owner);
> > > > + if ((owner & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) && (rcnt > 1) &&
> > > > + !(count & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED))
> > > > goto queue;
> > > > /*
> > > > - * Reader optimistic lock stealing.
> > > > + * Reader optimistic lock stealing
> > > > + *
> > > > + * We can take the read lock directly without doing
> > > > + * rwsem_optimistic_spin() if the conditions are right.
> > > > + * Also wake up other readers if it is the first reader.
> > > > */
> > > > - if (!(count & (RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))) {
> > > > + if (!(count & (RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)) &&
> > > > + rwsem_no_spinners(sem)) {
> > > > rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
> > > > lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_steal);
> > > > + if (rcnt == 1)
> > > > + goto wake_readers;
> > > > + return sem;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> > > > + if (!rwsem_opt_rspin)
> > > > + goto queue;
> > > > +#endif
> > > I would suggest changing that to
> > >
> > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER) || !rwsem_opt_rspin)
> > > goto queue;
> > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Save the current read-owner of rwsem, if available, and the
> > > > + * reader nonspinnable bit.
> > > > + */
> > > > + waiter.last_rowner = owner;
> > > > + if (!(waiter.last_rowner & RWSEM_READER_OWNED))
> > > > + waiter.last_rowner &= RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem, RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE))
> > > > + goto queue;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Undo read bias from down_read() and do optimistic spinning.
> > > > + */
> > > > + atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> > > > + adjustment = 0;
> > > > + if (rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem, false)) {
> > > > + /* rwsem_optimistic_spin() implies ACQUIRE on success */
> > > > /*
> > > > - * Wake up other readers in the wait queue if it is
> > > > - * the first reader.
> > > > + * Wake up other readers in the wait list if the front
> > > > + * waiter is a reader.
> > > > */
> > > > - if ((rcnt == 1) && (count & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> > > > +wake_readers:
> > > > + if ((atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> > > > raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > > > if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
> > > > rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED,
> > > > @@ -1029,6 +1205,9 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> > > > wake_up_q(&wake_q);
> > > > }
> > > > return sem;
> > > > + } else if (rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(sem, waiter.last_rowner)) {
> > > > + /* rwsem_reader_phase_trylock() implies ACQUIRE on success */
> > > > + return sem;
> > > > }
> > > > queue:
> > > > @@ -1045,7 +1224,8 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> > > > * immediately as its RWSEM_READER_BIAS has already been set
> > > > * in the count.
> > > > */
> > > > - if (!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_WRITER_MASK)) {
> > > > + if (adjustment && !(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) &
> > > > + RWSEM_WRITER_MASK)) {
> > > > /* Provide lock ACQUIRE */
> > > > smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
> > > > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > > > @@ -1058,7 +1238,10 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> > > > rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter);
> > > > /* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
> > > > - count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
> > > > + if (adjustment)
> > > > + count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
> > > > + else
> > > > + count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
> > > > rwsem_cond_wake_waiter(sem, count, &wake_q);
> > > > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > > > @@ -1100,21 +1283,43 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> > > > return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> > > > }
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * This function is called by the a write lock owner. So the owner value
> > > > + * won't get changed by others.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline void rwsem_disable_reader_optspin(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > > > + bool disable)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (unlikely(disable)) {
> > > > + atomic_long_or(RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE, &sem->owner);
> > > > + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_norspin);
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Wait until we successfully acquire the write lock
> > > > */
> > > > static struct rw_semaphore __sched *
> > > > rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
> > > > {
> > > > + bool disable_rspin;
> > > > struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
> > > > DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
> > > > /* do optimistic spinning and steal lock if possible */
> > > > - if (rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem) && rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem)) {
> > > > + if (rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem, RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE) &&
> > > > + rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem, true)) {
> > > > /* rwsem_optimistic_spin() implies ACQUIRE on success */
> > > > return sem;
> > > > }
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Disable reader optimistic spinning for this rwsem after
> > > > + * acquiring the write lock when the setting of the nonspinnable
> > > > + * bits are observed.
> > > > + */
> > > > + disable_rspin = atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE;
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Optimistic spinning failed, proceed to the slowpath
> > > > * and block until we can acquire the sem.
> > > > @@ -1170,7 +1375,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
> > > > if (waiter.handoff_set) {
> > > > enum owner_state owner_state;
> > > > - owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem);
> > > > + owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE);
> > > > if (owner_state == OWNER_NULL)
> > > > goto trylock_again;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -1182,6 +1387,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
> > > > raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > > > }
> > > > __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > > > + rwsem_disable_reader_optspin(sem, disable_rspin);
> > > > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > > > lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock);
> > > > trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> > > > @@ -1348,7 +1554,7 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(tmp < 0, sem);
> > > > if (unlikely((tmp & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) ==
> > > > RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> > > > - clear_nonspinnable(sem);
> > > > + clear_wr_nonspinnable(sem);
> > > > rwsem_wake(sem);
> > > > }
> > > > preempt_enable();
> > > I don't have a strong feeling pro or against it. It does provide a modest
> > > improvement in some use cases, but it does make the code a bit more complex
> > > and harder to understand.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Longman
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists