[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjvgL5nyZmpYRWBfab4NKvfQ7NjUvUhE3a3wYTyTEHdfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:28:05 -0400
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in short splice to socket?
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:23 AM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> +/*
> + * Pass a zero-length record to the splice-write actor with SPLICE_F_MORE
> + * turned off to allow the network to see MSG_MORE deasserted.
> + */
> +static ssize_t splice_from_pipe_zero(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
David, STOP.
Stop doing these crazy hacks to generic splice code. None of this makes sense.
Those zero-sized splices have never worked, don't try to make them work.
The splice() system call has always had that
if (!len)
return 0;
since being introduced. We're not adding any crazy stuff now.
Do what I already suggested: making SPLICE_F_MORE reflect reality.
Or don't do anything at all. Because this kind of hacky garbage is not
even amusing.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists