[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230605165245.GA140@W11-BEAU-MD.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 09:52:45 -0700
From: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kelulanainsley@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] tracing/user_events: Fix the incorrect trace
record for empty arguments events
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:30:20PM +0800, sunliming wrote:
> The user_events support events that has empty arguments. But the trace event
> is discarded and not really committed when the arguments is empty. Fix this
> by not attempting to copy in zero-length data.
>
> Signed-off-by: sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>
> ---
This series looks good to me, functionally. I applied it locally and ran
this code with the new test additions. Everything works well. Thank you!
The only thing I ask before an ACK is patch 2 and 4 in the series only use
"user_events: " prefix. Can you change these to "selftests/user_events: "?
You marked 3 this way, so I'd like to stick with a consistent form:
I think it would be good going forward we use "tracing/user_events"
for functional changes and "selftests/user_events" for self test
changes.
Thanks,
-Beau
> kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> index 0d91dac206ff..698703a3d234 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> @@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ static void user_event_ftrace(struct user_event *user, struct iov_iter *i,
> if (unlikely(!entry))
> return;
>
> - if (unlikely(!copy_nofault(entry + 1, i->count, i)))
> + if (unlikely(i->count != 0 && !copy_nofault(entry + 1, i->count, i)))
> goto discard;
>
> if (!list_empty(&user->validators) &&
> @@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ static void user_event_perf(struct user_event *user, struct iov_iter *i,
>
> perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
>
> - if (unlikely(!copy_nofault(perf_entry + 1, i->count, i)))
> + if (unlikely(i->count != 0 && !copy_nofault(perf_entry + 1, i->count, i)))
> goto discard;
>
> if (!list_empty(&user->validators) &&
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists