[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d69977d-c384-aa4b-c09a-43ffd1f8ec76@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:28:31 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] selftests/mm: move uffd* routines from vm_util.c
to uffd-common.c
On 6/5/23 12:24, Peter Xu wrote:
...
>> It sounds like you are suggesting this:
>>
>> $(OUTPUT)/uffd-stress: uffd-common.c uffd-test-common.c
>> $(OUTPUT)/uffd-unit-tests: uffd-common.c uffd-test-common.c
>> $(OUTPUT)/hugepage-mremap: uffd-test-common.c
>> $(OUTPUT)/write_to_hugetlbfs: uffd-test-common.c
>> $(OUTPUT)/ksm_functional_tests: uffd-test-common.c
>>
>> ...approximately. Do I have that correct? I can arrange it that way
>> if you feel it's a better end result. (And it's better than leaving
>> uffd*() helpers in vm_utils, imho.)
>
> Yes, as long as we don't link (especially) the uffd test specific globals
> into non-uffd test programs I'll have no issue. Thanks.
>
OK very good. I'll put that together.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists