[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH3rVcSr+m8DHmo9@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:04:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Add pci_dev_for_each_resource() helper and update
users
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 04:30:28PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 08:48:35PM +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote:
...
> > Looking at the code I understand where coverity is coming from:
> >
> > #define __pci_dev_for_each_res0(dev, res, ...) \
> > for (unsigned int __b = 0; \
> > res = pci_resource_n(dev, __b), __b < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; \
> > __b++)
> >
> > res will be assigned before __b is checked for being less than
> > PCI_NUM_RESOURCES, making it point to behind the array at the end of
> > the last loop iteration.
> >
> > Rewriting the test expression as
> >
> > __b < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES && (res = pci_resource_n(dev, __b));
> >
> > should avoid the (coverity) warning by making use of lazy evaluation.
> >
> > It probably makes the code slightly less performant as res will now be
> > checked for being not NULL (which will always be true), but I doubt it
> > will be significant (or in any hot paths).
>
> Thanks a lot for looking into this! I think you're right, and I think
> the rewritten expression is more logical as well. Do you want to post
> a patch for it?
Gimme some time, I was on a long leave and now it's a pile to handle.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists