linux-kernel - RE: Fwd: nvsp_rndis_pkt_complete error status and net_ratelimit: callbacks suppressed messages on 6.4.0rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BYAPR21MB16887C59D2B2C3ADDB61874BD74DA@BYAPR21MB1688.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 14:08:06 +0000
From:   "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
CC:     Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux BPF <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux on Hyper-V <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Subject: RE: Fwd: nvsp_rndis_pkt_complete error status and net_ratelimit:
 callbacks suppressed messages on 6.4.0rc4

From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) <regressions@...mhuis.info> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 3:28 AM
> 
> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker.
> 
> On 30.05.23 14:25, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >
> > I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
> 
> Hmmm, nobody replied to this yet (or am I missing something?). Doesn't
> seems like it's something urgent, but nevertheless:
> 
> Michael, Bagas didn't make it obvious at all, hence please allow me to
> ask: did you notice that this is a regression that is apparently caused
> by a commit of yours?
> 

Thanks for flagging this directly to me.  I'll check on it.

Michael