lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 06 Jun 2023 16:46:25 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        James Seo <james@...iv.tech>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:

> On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:22:46 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > Note that some maintainers process pull requests from patchwork, not
>> > from their mailbox, and prefer not to be aadressed in the To or CC
>> > headers. I don't know how widespread that is.  
>> 
>> FWIW I belong to this group and prefer not be in To or Cc, I'll always
>> check the patch from patchwork.
>
> Ah, I didn't realize this. 

So no action needed for this, I'm sure I'm in a very small minority and
I can handle the mails with my filters just fine. Just wanted to comment
that such maintainers do exist.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ