lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230605103029.3fb821db@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:30:29 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        James Seo <james@...iv.tech>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc'
 lists

On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:22:46 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Note that some maintainers process pull requests from patchwork, not
> > from their mailbox, and prefer not to be aadressed in the To or CC
> > headers. I don't know how widespread that is.  
> 
> FWIW I belong to this group and prefer not be in To or Cc, I'll always
> check the patch from patchwork.

Ah, I didn't realize this. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ