[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 15:44:55 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
"Franziska Naepelt" <franziska.naepelt@...glemail.com>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Franziska Naepelt" <franziska.naepelt@...il.com>,
"kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] certs/extract-cert: Fix checkpatch issues
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> Fixes tag?
That's not really necessary in this case. It's not fixing any bugs so much as
keeping checkpatch happy, so there's not much point backporting the patches.
> IMHO should be split to separate commits with fixes tags for
> trackability sake.
I think a single patch is fine for what it's doing. Let's not add a bunch of
individual one-liner keeping-checkpatch-happy patches.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists