lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:46:25 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:08:27PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 19:53:22 +0530, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Siddh,
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch.
> 
> Anytime :)
> 
> > Any plan to remove it from drivers as well ? If not you should mention
> > in the commit message (probably in the subject line itself) that you're
> > only addressing the DRM core.
> > 
> > Same comment for further patches in this series.
> 
> Yeah, this patch set aims to replace just in drm core (as mentioned in
> the cover).
> 
> I thought "drm" would suffice since I did not specify a specific driver
> like i915. So the subject line should say "drm core: ..."?

I would write

drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO in DRM core

The "drm: " prefix doesn't imply you're touching the core only, you
could do a tree-wide change that also touches all drivers.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ