[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:46:25 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:08:27PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 19:53:22 +0530, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Siddh,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
>
> Anytime :)
>
> > Any plan to remove it from drivers as well ? If not you should mention
> > in the commit message (probably in the subject line itself) that you're
> > only addressing the DRM core.
> >
> > Same comment for further patches in this series.
>
> Yeah, this patch set aims to replace just in drm core (as mentioned in
> the cover).
>
> I thought "drm" would suffice since I did not specify a specific driver
> like i915. So the subject line should say "drm core: ..."?
I would write
drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO in DRM core
The "drm: " prefix doesn't imply you're touching the core only, you
could do a tree-wide change that also touches all drivers.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists