[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:30:59 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] media: dt-bindings: mediatek,vcodec: Remove VDEC_SYS
for mt8183
Il 05/06/23 18:20, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> The binding expects the first register space to be VDEC_SYS. But on
> mt8183, which uses the stateless decoders, this space is used only for
> controlling clocks and resets, which are better described as separate
> clock-controller and reset-controller nodes.
>
> In fact, in mt8173's devicetree there are already such separate
> clock-controller nodes, which cause duplicate addresses between the
> vdecsys node and the vcodec node. But for this SoC, since the stateful
> decoder code makes other uses of the VDEC_SYS register space, it's not
> straightforward to remove it.
>
> In order to avoid the same address conflict to happen on mt8183,
> since the only current use of the VDEC_SYS register space in
> the driver is to read the status of a clock that indicates the hardware
> is active, remove the VDEC_SYS register space from the binding and
> describe an extra clock that will be used to directly check the hardware
> status.
>
> Also add reg-names to be able to tell that this new register schema is
> used, so the driver can keep backward compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists