[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c1973d1-38c0-6048-90ad-da2f60df8238@sberdevices.ru>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 17:52:32 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
<oxffffaa@...il.com>, <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: nand: meson: Fix 'nand-rb' property
On 07.06.2023 12:36, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Arseniy,
>
> avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:04:29 +0300:
>
>> On 07.06.2023 12:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 07/06/2023 10:57, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07.06.2023 11:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 07/06/2023 10:40, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>>> Hello Miquel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07.06.2023 10:58, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Arseniy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Tue, 6 Jun 2023 22:35:07 +0300:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add description of 'nand-rb' property. Use "Fixes" because this property
>>>>>>>> must be supported since the beginning. For this controller 'nand-rb' is
>>>>>>>> stored in the controller node (not in chip), because it has only single
>>>>>>>> r/b wire for all chips.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry if I mislead you in the first place, but you could definitely
>>>>>>> have two chips and only one with RB wired. It needs to be defined in
>>>>>>> the chips.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, so to clarify: is it ok, that in bindings this property will be placed in the
>>>>>> chip, but in driver, i'm trying to read it from the controller node (thus in
>>>>>> dts file it will be also in controller node)?
>
> The bindings and your driver internal representation are two different
> things. Anyway, as mentioned above, wiring the RB line to one die and
> not the other would be valid hardware design and would require the rb
> property to be in the chip node. Please perform a per-chip property read
> in the driver as well.
Done, I resend both patches (bindings + driver update) as a single patchset. Your review comments
for driver code were also fixed.
>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, because how would your DTS pass validation? I understand you did not
>>>>> test the bindings, but this will improve, right?
>>>>
>>>> Ok, i'll follow DTS layout in the driver, "test the bindings" You mean "make dt_binding_check"?
>>>
>>> Yes. They were sent without testing.
>>>
>>> But please also test your DTS with dtbs_check.
Done
Thanks, Arseniy
>>
>> Got it!
>>
>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists