[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9105207b-0dfb-346f-422f-984cf3454f90@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:58:30 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
oxffffaa@...il.com, kernel@...rdevices.ru,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: nand: meson: Fix 'nand-rb' property
On 07/06/2023 16:52, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
> On 07.06.2023 12:36, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi Arseniy,
>>
>> avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:04:29 +0300:
>>
>>> On 07.06.2023 12:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 07/06/2023 10:57, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07.06.2023 11:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/06/2023 10:40, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello Miquel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07.06.2023 10:58, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Arseniy,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Tue, 6 Jun 2023 22:35:07 +0300:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Add description of 'nand-rb' property. Use "Fixes" because this property
>>>>>>>>> must be supported since the beginning. For this controller 'nand-rb' is
>>>>>>>>> stored in the controller node (not in chip), because it has only single
>>>>>>>>> r/b wire for all chips.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry if I mislead you in the first place, but you could definitely
>>>>>>>> have two chips and only one with RB wired. It needs to be defined in
>>>>>>>> the chips.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, so to clarify: is it ok, that in bindings this property will be placed in the
>>>>>>> chip, but in driver, i'm trying to read it from the controller node (thus in
>>>>>>> dts file it will be also in controller node)?
>>
>> The bindings and your driver internal representation are two different
>> things. Anyway, as mentioned above, wiring the RB line to one die and
>> not the other would be valid hardware design and would require the rb
>> property to be in the chip node. Please perform a per-chip property read
>> in the driver as well.
>
> Done, I resend both patches (bindings + driver update) as a single patchset. Your review comments
> for driver code were also fixed.
No, please send new version, not the same. New version means with fixed
comments and with patch changelog.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists