[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230608185142.GA1019250@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:51:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:20:19AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Presumably, one could simply just not use RAII(/SBRM someone else
> corrected me about this recently coincidentally; I taught them my fun
> C++ acronym IDGAF) when working with a value that conditionally
> "escapes" the local scope.
But then you're back to the error goto :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists