[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230608200618.GA1020752@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 22:06:18 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ojeda@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, mingo@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:45:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > DEFINE_CLASS(kfree, void *, kfree(THIS), p, void *p)
> >
> > smart_ptr(kfree, mem) = kzalloc_node(...);
> > if (!mem)
> > return -ENOMEM;
>
> No, the above is broken, and would result in us using "void *" in
> situations where we really *really* don't want that.
>
> For automatic freeing, you want something that can handle different
> types properly, and without having to constantly declare the types
> somewhere else before use.
Ah, I see what you did with the no_free_ptr(), that avoids having to
have two pointers around, nice!
> So for convenient automatic pointer freeing, you want an interface
> much more akin to
>
> struct whatever *ptr __automatic_kfree = kmalloc(...);
>
> which is much more legible, doesn't have any type mis-use issues, and
> is also just trivially dealt with by a
>
> static inline void automatic_kfree_wrapper(void *pp)
> { void *p = *(void **)pp; if (p) kfree(p); }
> #define __automatic_kfree \
> __attribute__((__cleanup__(automatic_kfree_wrapper)))
> #define no_free_ptr(p) \
> ({ __auto_type __ptr = (p); (p) = NULL; __ptr; })
>
> which I just tested generates the sane code even for the "set the ptr
> to NULL and return success" case.
>
> The above allows you to trivially do things like
>
> struct whatever *p __automatic_kfree = kmalloc(..);
>
> if (!do_something(p))
> return -ENOENT;
>
> return no_free_ptr(p);
>
> and it JustWorks(tm).
OK, something like so then?
#define DEFINE_FREE(name, type, free) \
static inline __free_##name(type *p) { type _P = *p; free; }
#define __free(name) __cleanup(__free_##name)
#define no_free_ptr(p) \
({ __auto_type __ptr = (p); (p) = NULL; __ptr; })
DEFINE_FREE(kfree, void *, if (_P) kfree(_P));
struct obj *p __free(kfree) = kmalloc(...);
if (!do_something(p))
return -ENOENT;
return no_free_ptr(p);
DEFINE_CLASS(find_get_context, struct perf_event_context *,
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_C)) put_ctx(_C),
find_get_context(task, event), struct task_struct *task, struct perf_event *event)
DEFINE_FREE(free_event, struct perf_event *,
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_P)) free_event(_P));
struct perf_event *event __free(free_event) = perf_event_alloc(...)
if (IS_ERR(event))
return event;
class(find_get_context, ctx)(task, event);
if (IS_ERR(ctx))
return (void*)ctx;
if (!task && !container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx)->online)
return -ENODEV;
...
event->ctx = get_ctx(ctx);
return no_free_ptr(event);
works for me, I'll go make it happen.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists