linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 4/4] pinctrl: intel: simplify exit path of gpio_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230608070017.28072-5-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Date:   Thu,  8 Jun 2023 12:30:17 +0530
From:   Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
To:     linus.walleij@...aro.org, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com, pandith.n@...el.com,
        Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/4] pinctrl: intel: simplify exit path of gpio_request_enable hook

Simplify exit path of ->gpio_request_enable() hook
and save a few bytes.

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-36 (-36)
Function                                     old     new   delta
intel_gpio_request_enable                    186     150     -36
Total: Before=10431, After=10395, chg -0.35%

Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index 1b5745202058..947797d87c93 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -489,20 +489,22 @@ static int intel_gpio_request_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
 	void __iomem *padcfg0;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
 
 	padcfg0 = intel_get_padcfg(pctrl, pin, PADCFG0);
 
+	/* For positive cases */
+	ret = 0;
+
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
 
 	if (!intel_pad_owned_by_host(pctrl, pin)) {
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-	if (!intel_pad_is_unlocked(pctrl, pin)) {
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
-		return 0;
-	}
+	if (!intel_pad_is_unlocked(pctrl, pin))
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	/*
 	 * If pin is already configured in GPIO mode, we assume that
@@ -510,16 +512,15 @@ static int intel_gpio_request_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	 * potential glitches on the pin. Otherwise, for the pin in
 	 * alternative mode, consumer has to supply respective flags.
 	 */
-	if (intel_gpio_get_gpio_mode(padcfg0) == PADCFG0_PMODE_GPIO) {
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
-		return 0;
-	}
+	if (intel_gpio_get_gpio_mode(padcfg0) == PADCFG0_PMODE_GPIO)
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	intel_gpio_set_gpio_mode(padcfg0);
 
+out_unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int intel_gpio_set_direction(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
-- 
2.17.1