[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ff8c948-c5e2-ac5b-6633-8583b8cb75fe@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 08:22:06 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: suhua <suhua.tanke@...il.com>, lizefan.x@...edance.com,
tj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Fix comment in cpuset_hotplug_workfn
On 6/8/23 04:54, suhua wrote:
> "synchronize cpus_allowed to cpu_active_mask"
> -> "synchronize cpu_active_mask to cpus_allowed"
>
> Signed-off-by: suhua <suhua.tanke@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index b0aee733b92b..4810d29e2d63 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -3739,7 +3739,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!cpus_updated && top_cpuset.nr_subparts_cpus)
> cpus_updated = true;
>
> - /* synchronize cpus_allowed to cpu_active_mask */
> + /* synchronize cpu_active_mask to cpus_allowed */
> if (cpus_updated) {
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> if (!on_dfl)
The comment is a bit outdated. The synchronization is only meant for
cgroup v1, but it is correct in this regard. We are matching
cpus_allowed of top_cpuset to cpu_active_mask, not the other way around.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists