[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIHKWYMs1e/rOez0@matsya>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 18:02:25 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org,
rfoss@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, djakov@...nel.org,
stephan@...hold.net, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] dt-bindings: dma: Add support for SM6115 and
QCM2290 SoCs
On 29-05-23, 11:43, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> > On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 00:52, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Add new compatible for BAM DMA engine version v1.7.4 which is
> > found on Qualcomm SM6115 and QCM2290 SoCs. Since its very similar
> > to v1.7.0 used on SM8150 like SoCs, mark the comptible scheme
> > accordingly.
> >
> > While at it, also update qcom,bam-dma bindings to add comments
> > which describe the BAM DMA versions used in SM8150 and SM8250 SoCs.
> > This provides an easy reference for identifying the actual BAM DMA
> > version available on Qualcomm SoCs.
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
> > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml | 20 ++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
> > index f1ddcf672261..c663b6102f50 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
> > @@ -15,13 +15,19 @@ allOf:
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > - enum:
> > - # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960
> > - - qcom,bam-v1.3.0
> > - # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084
> > - - qcom,bam-v1.4.0
> > - # MSM8916 and SDM845
> > - - qcom,bam-v1.7.0
> > + oneOf:
> > + - enum:
> > + # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960
> > + - qcom,bam-v1.3.0
> > + # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084
> > + - qcom,bam-v1.4.0
> > + # MSM8916, SDM630
> > + - qcom,bam-v1.7.0
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + # SDM845, SM6115, SM8150, SM8250 and QCM2290
> > + - qcom,bam-v1.7.4
> > + - const: qcom,bam-v1.7.0
> >
> > clocks:
> > maxItems: 1
> > --
> > 2.38.1
>
> Bjorn has applied the dts patches from this series to his tree.
> As suggested by him, can you please pick patches [PATCH 1/11] and
> [PATCH 2/11] from this series via the 'dmaengine' tree.
I dont have this series in my inbox or dmaengine pw
> Seems some Cc fields got messed up while sending the patchset, so
> Cc'ing the dmaengine list again.
not just list but mine too..
Please rebase and resend
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists