linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8186: Wire up CPU frequency/voltage scaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Jun 2023 16:18:58 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8186: Wire up CPU
 frequency/voltage scaling

Il 07/06/23 11:06, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> This adds clocks, dynamic power coefficients, and OPP tables for the CPU
> cores, so that everything required at the SoC level for CPU freqency and
> voltage scaling is available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi | 274 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 274 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi
> index 1b754f7a0725..6735c1feb26d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi
> @@ -136,6 +136,240 @@ cci_opp_15: opp-1400000000 {
>   		};
>   	};
>   
> +	cluster0_opp: opp-table-cluster0 {
> +		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +		opp-shared;
> +
> +		opp-500000000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
> +			opp-microvolt = <600000>;
> +			opp-level = <15>;

As far as I remember we don't need opp-level, can you please recheck that
and in case remove the levels from all OPPs?

Thanks,
Angelo