linux-kernel - Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 09 Jun 2023 17:19:15 +0300
From:   "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     "Krishna Yarlagadda" <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>,
        "jsnitsel@...hat.com" <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>,
        "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "Sowjanya Komatineni" <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        "Laxman Dewangan" <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling

On Thu Jun 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM EEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:36:51PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:04:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > > > any ideas on how we can best get this merged? I guess at this point it
> > > > could go through either tree since the SPI dependency has been in Linus'
> > > > tree since v6.4-rc1.
>
> > > I would expect it to go via whatever path TPM patches usually take given
> > > that it's a TPM patch.
>
> > There might have been a misunderstanding. My recollection was that you
> > had said a few weeks ago that you would pick this up. Going through the
> > thread again I realize that may not have been what you meant. Perhaps
> > Jarkko misinterpreted this in the same way.
>
> > Jarkko, can you pick this up for v6.5?
>
> No, I said that I had applied the SPI parts for v6.4 so there would be
> no blocker whenever people got round to reviewing the TPM side.

I'm totally cool with this: won't pick the patch then.

BR, Jarkko