[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZINHh5xmqK/zprwd@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:38:47 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] device property: Implement device_is_compatible()
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:33:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 06:25:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Some users want to use the struct device pointer to see if
> > the device is compatible. Provide inline helpers for them.
> What do you mean by "compatible"?
In terms of how OF defines it (note that ACPI may also utilize it,
so it's wider than there).
I will elaborate this in v2.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists