[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK77OW3n0PW6zP3FNdmuQHnDp9=wfX4E3ga-VW0_LRHHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 11:01:23 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: drop assertions for GPIO hog messages
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 8:36 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> These have now been demoted to debug and are normally hidden. Drop the
> assertions entirely.
>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 28 ----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
Why is this a separate patch? Don't I get at least 5 days to
review/ack changes in drivers/of/?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists