[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230610-enchanted-late-e545ab2d74a0@spud>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 16:53:40 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
Ramona Bolboaca <ramona.bolboaca@...log.com>,
Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@...gutronix.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add Allwinner
D1/T113s/R329/T507 SoCs GPADC
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 06:48:08PM +0300, Maxim Kiselev wrote:
> Hey,
>
> сб, 10 июн. 2023 г. в 18:06, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>:
>
> ...
>
> > >+
> > >+ required:
> > >+ - reg
> > >+
> > >+ additionalProperties: false
[1]
> > >+
> > >+required:
> > >+ - "#io-channel-cells"
> > >+ - clocks
> > >+ - compatible
> > >+ - interrupts
> > >+ - reg
> > >+ - resets
> > >+
> > >+unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> > How come this one changed to unevaluatedProperties: false?
> > Wasn't it for the ADC that we previously discussed whether
> > additionalProperties: false was correct or not?
>
> Hmm, I changed it to `unevaluatedProperties: false` as you suggested
> in this message
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230604-afternoon-frighten-42222010557b@spud/
That was about the adc child nodes [1], not at the top level, no?
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists