linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Enable AMD3255 Proc to show negative temperature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8f009142-61a5-3b26-79f9-f89902d62354@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Fri, 9 Jun 2023 19:00:54 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Baskaran Kannan <Baski.Kannan@....com>, Mario.Limonciello@....com,
        babu.moger@....com, clemens@...isch.de, jdelvare@...e.com,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable AMD3255 Proc to show negative temperature

On 6/9/23 16:11, Baskaran Kannan wrote:
> From: Your Name <you@...mple.com>
> 

Patch description missing here. Also, obviously, as Randy already mentioned,
"Your Name <you@...mple.com>" isn't acceptable.

> Signed-off-by: Baski Kannan <Baski.Kannan@....com>
> ---
>   drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c b/drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c
> index 489ad0b1bc74..58e4d90de5e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(nb_smu_ind_mutex);
>   #define ZEN_CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL_MASK		BIT(19)
>   #define ZEN_CUR_TEMP_TJ_SEL_MASK		GENMASK(17, 16)
>   
> +/* AMD's Industrial processor 3255 supports temperature from -40 deg to 105 deg Celsius.
> + * Do not round off to zero for negative Tctl or Tdie values
> + */
> +#define AMD_I3255_STR				"3255"
> +
>   struct k10temp_data {
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>   	void (*read_htcreg)(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 *regval);
> @@ -86,6 +91,7 @@ struct k10temp_data {
>   	u32 show_temp;
>   	bool is_zen;
>   	u32 ccd_offset;
> +	bool disp_negative; /*Flag set for AMD i3255. Family 17h, Model 0x0-0xf */

Space after '*'

>   };
>   
>   #define TCTL_BIT	0
> @@ -204,9 +210,15 @@ static int k10temp_read_temp(struct device *dev, u32 attr, int channel,
>   		switch (channel) {
>   		case 0:		/* Tctl */
>   			*val = get_raw_temp(data);
> +			if (*val < 0 && (data->disp_negative == false) ){
> +				*val = 0;
> +			}

It seems like this patch doesn't replace the previous version,
it is applied on top of it. Please don't do that. The previous version
was not accepted. Send a new version instead.

>   			break;
>   		case 1:		/* Tdie */
>   			*val = get_raw_temp(data) - data->temp_offset;
> +			if (*val < 0 && (data->disp_negative == false) ){

This violates Linux kernel style (space before {).
Also, () around the second expression is unnecessary, as is == false.
Please use !data->disp_negative instead. Also, the {} is unnecessary.

> +				*val = 0;
> +			}
>   			break;
>   		case 2 ... 13:		/* Tccd{1-12} */
>   			amd_smn_read(amd_pci_dev_to_node_id(data->pdev),
> @@ -401,6 +413,11 @@ static int k10temp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>   	data->pdev = pdev;
>   	data->show_temp |= BIT(TCTL_BIT);	/* Always show Tctl */
>   
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x17 &&
> +		strstr(boot_cpu_data.x86_model_id, AMD_I3255_STR)) {

Multi-line alignment seems wrong, and there is no need for {}.
Please make sure that checkpatch --strict is clean.

> +		data->disp_negative = true;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 &&
>   	    ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model & 0xf0) == 0x60 ||
>   	     (boot_cpu_data.x86_model & 0xf0) == 0x70)) {