[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <573e1bac-57a6-466c-ab69-28366a300143@kadam.mountain>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:00:50 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: daniel@...ll.ch, javierm@...hat.com, sam@...nborg.org,
deller@....de, geert+renesas@...der.be, lee@...nel.org,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, jingoohan1@...il.com,
michael.j.ruhl@...el.com, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/38] backlight/bd6107: Compare against struct
fb_info.device
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:07:39PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Struct bd6107_platform_data refers to a platform device within
> the Linux device hierarchy. The test in bd6107_backlight_check_fb()
> compares it against the fbdev device in struct fb_info.dev, which
> is different. Fix the test by comparing to struct fb_info.device.
>
> Fixes a bug in the backlight driver and prepares fbdev for making
> struct fb_info.dev optional.
>
> v2:
> * move renames into separate patch (Javier, Sam, Michael)
>
Thanks. This helps a lot. I stared at this for a long time without
seeing the fix. Then I misunderstood Sam's review comments (my fault,
they were clear in retrospect) so I got completely lost.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists