[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230612204514.292087-33-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:44:54 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org, kernel-team@...a.com, w@....eu,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 nolibc 33/53] tools/nolibc: s390: disable stackprotector in _start
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
s390 does not support the "global" stack protector mode that is
implemented in nolibc.
Now that nolibc detects if stack protectors are enabled at runtime it
could happen that a future compiler does indeed use global mode on
and nolibc would compile but segfault at runtime.
To avoid this hypothetic case and to align s390 with the other
architectures disable stack protectors when compiling _start().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h
index a738e7f3f8e8..516dff5bff8b 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
#include <asm/signal.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
+#include "compiler.h"
+
/* The struct returned by the stat() syscall, equivalent to stat64(). The
* syscall returns 116 bytes and stops in the middle of __unused.
*/
@@ -164,7 +166,7 @@ char **environ __attribute__((weak));
const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
"lg %r2,0(%r15)\n" /* argument count */
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists