linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] Add camera clock controller support for SM8550

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09ccfa54-5ada-8dff-03a2-b2ffb07a58c1@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 03:25:42 +0100
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
        Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
        Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] Add camera clock controller support for SM8550

On 09/06/2023 12:50, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
> Add bindings, driver and devicetree node for camera clock controller on
> SM8550.

This is very confusing.

Your cover letter doesn't detail any changes and your individual patches 
all say "no changes since v3", "no changes since v2"

If this is a RESEND then mark it as a RESEND.

Good practice is to for example add a note that says

"I looked at updating the yaml for the camcc but opted to do this in 
another series" or "opted not to do this at this time" or "it doesn't 
make sense because of X"

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/546876ba-970d-5cd5-648e-723698ca74fd@linaro.org/

Could you perhaps RESEND this V4 with a log that explains what has 
changed from one version to the next.

If nothing has changed then don't bump the version prefix with RESEND..

Second thought even replying to your cover email with the changelog 
would do.....

---
bod